|
|
NPRR124
| Title: |
Resource Node Updated Definitions |
| Next Group: |
|
| Next Step: |
|
| Status: |
Approved |
| Related Issue: |
|
| Related Project: |
|
| Date |
Gov Body |
Motion |
Result |
Against |
Abstentions |
| 10/21/2008 |
Board of Directors
|
The ERCOT Board approved NPRR124 as revised by the ERCOT Board. |
Passed |
|
|
| 10/02/2008 |
TAC
|
To recommend approval of NPRR124 as recommended by PRS. |
Passed |
|
|
| 09/24/2008 |
PRS
|
To endorse and forward the PRS Recommendation Report and Impact Analysis to TAC. |
Passed |
|
|
| 07/17/2008 |
PRS
|
To recommend approval of NPRR124 as amended by TPTF comments and as revised by PRS. |
Passed |
0 |
0 |
| 06/19/2008 |
PRS
|
To refer NPRR124 to TPTF to clarify the meaning of “logical construct” and consider adding a definition for “logical resource node.” |
Passed |
0 |
0 |
| 02/19/2008 |
TPTF
|
To endorse forwarding TPTF comments to the Protocol Revision Subcommittee (PRS) with the understanding that ERCOT will bring back to TPTF a procedure detailing the assigning of Resource Nodes using the struck language from the discussion document. |
Passed |
0 |
3 Coop and IOU (2) |
| 04/18/2008 |
PRS
|
To refer NPRR124 to TPTF for review. |
Passed |
0 |
0 |
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
| Status: |
Approved |
| Date Posted: |
04/10/2008 |
| Sponsor: |
ERCOT Staff |
| Urgent: |
No |
| Sections: |
Section 2.1, Definitions |
| Description: |
This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) clarifies the definition for Resource Node and specifies the different Resource Node types that meet the Nodal Protocol requirements. |
| Reason: |
The current definition of Resource Node limits the capabilities of the intended Nodal Market and is inconsistently used within the Protocols based on explicit and implicit requirements. There is a need for more Resource Node types to fully capture the intent of the Protocols. |
-
(10/21/08, .doc, )
-
(10/02/08, .doc, )
-
(10/02/08, .doc, )
-
(09/23/08, .doc, )
-
(09/03/08, .xls, )
-
(08/20/08, .doc, )
-
(07/21/08, .doc, )
-
(07/11/08, .doc, )
-
(02/06/09, .xls, )
-
(06/23/08, .doc, )
-
(06/12/08, .doc, )
-
(06/12/08, .xls, )
-
(04/22/08, .doc, )
-
(04/10/08, .doc, )
|
